BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.S.B. 481 |
By: Hancock |
Insurance |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Balance billing is the practice
of physicians billing patients for the portion of medical expenses not
covered by the patient's insurance. Most commonly, this occurs when a
facility-based physician does not have a contract with the same health
benefit plans that have contracted with the facility in which the physician
practices. Although interested parties contend that the mediation process created
in response to recently enacted legislation is working for consumers when it
is available, concerns remain that balance billing continues to be common
practice and it has become increasingly difficult for consumers to avoid in
emergency care situations.
|
||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.S.B. 481 amends the Health and Safety Code and Insurance Code to add an assistant surgeon to the definition of "facility-based physician" for purposes of statutory provisions relating to consumer access to health care information, disclosure of provider status, and out-of-network claim dispute resolution.
C.S.S.B. 481 amends the Insurance Code to revise the content of the billing statement that a facility-based physician who bills a patient covered by a preferred provider benefit plan or a health benefit plan under the Texas Employees Group Benefits Act that does not have a contract with the facility-based physician is required to send to the patient to specify that the statement contain a conspicuous, plain-language explanation of the mandatory mediation process available under statutory provisions relating to out-of-network claim dispute resolution under certain conditions, instead of contain information sufficient to notify the patient of such mediation process under certain conditions. The bill revises the monetary condition triggering the requirement that the statement be sent from the amount for which the enrollee is responsible to the physician, after copayments, deductibles, and coinsurance, including the amount unpaid by the administrator or insurer, being greater than $1,000 to such an amount being greater than $500.
C.S.S.B. 481 lowers from $1,000 to $500 the threshold amount for which the enrollee is responsible to a facility-based physician, after copayments, deductibles, and coinsurance, including the amount unpaid by the administrator or insurer above which an enrollee is authorized to request mediation of a settlement of an out-of-network health benefit claim.
|
||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF SENATE ENGROSSED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.S.B. 481 may differ from the engrossed version in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the engrossed and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||
|