BILL ANALYSIS |
S.B. 812 |
By: Rodríguez |
Juvenile Justice & Family Issues |
Committee Report (Unamended) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that authorizing associate judges to hear and render judgments in name change suits would allow these generally uncontroversial suits to be heard faster in counties in which there is an associate judge, which would help relieve the crowded dockets facing some district judges. S.B. 812 seeks to address this issue.
|
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
ANALYSIS
S.B. 812 amends the Family Code to include a judge of a court with jurisdiction of a suit relating to a name change among the judges authorized to appoint an associate judge and a visiting associate judge to perform certain duties and to authorize a judge to refer to an associate judge any aspect of such a suit.
|
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|