BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.S.B. 2068 |
By: Eltife |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested stakeholders note that the Harrison County Court at Law recently became a full-time court and argue that the court's jurisdiction should be expanded in order to increase judicial efficiency. C.S.S.B. 2068 seeks to expand the jurisdiction of the Harrison County Court at Law to have concurrent jurisdiction with the district court of Harrison County in certain criminal and civil matters.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.S.B. 2068 amends the Government Code to expand the types of cases for which a county court at law in Harrison County has concurrent jurisdiction with the district court to include, in addition to family law cases and proceedings, civil cases and felony cases other than capital murder cases and to entitle the criminal district attorney in these cases to the same fees prescribed by law for prosecutions in a district court. The bill requires a jury to be composed of 12 members in any civil case pending in which the amount in controversy is $200,000 or more and in any felony case.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF SENATE ENGROSSED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.S.B. 2068 may differ from the engrossed in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the engrossed and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|