TO: | Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means |
FROM: | Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board |
IN RE: | HB1906 by Springer (Relating to the repeal of the production taxes on crude petroleum and sulphur.), As Introduced |
Fiscal Year | Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds |
---|---|
2016 | ($5,374,000) |
2017 | ($5,573,000) |
2018 | ($5,572,000) |
2019 | ($5,672,000) |
2020 | ($5,724,000) |
Fiscal Year | Probable Revenue (Loss) from General Revenue Fund 1 |
Probable Revenue (Loss) from Foundation School Fund 193 |
---|---|---|
2016 | ($4,437,750) | ($936,250) |
2017 | ($4,624,250) | ($948,750) |
2018 | ($4,611,000) | ($961,000) |
2019 | ($4,698,750) | ($973,250) |
2020 | ($4,738,250) | ($985,750) |
The oil regulation tax in the amount of three-sixteenths of one cent on each barrel of crude oil produced from the state would be abolished. The severance tax on sulphur in the amount of $1.03 a long ton or fraction of a long ton of sulphur produced in this state would be abolished. The fiscal impact estimates were based on the 2016-17 Biennial Revenue Estimate.
The sulphur production tax is an occupation tax, thus 25 percent of the tax is constitutionally dedicated to the Foundation School Fund. This revenue loss from the Foundation School Fund is displayed in the above table.
The Comptroller's office has indicated that repealing the oil regulation and sulphur production taxes, when combined with the repeal of taxes on liquefied gas, controlled substances, inheritances, and fireworks, will allow the Comptroller to redeploy resources to audit and enforcement activities for other sources of revenue. It is expected that redeploying these resources will generate revenue sufficient to offset revenue lost from repealing oil regulation and sulphur production taxes.
Source Agencies: | 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
|
LBB Staff: | UP, KK, SD
|