LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
April 7, 2015

TO:
Honorable Robert Nichols, Chair, Senate Committee on Transportation
 
FROM:
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
SB1043 by Nichols (Relating to the regulation of motor vehicles by the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles and the Department of Public Safety; creating a criminal offense; providing a penalty; authorizing fees.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted



Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB1043, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted: a negative impact of ($2,999,691) through the biennium ending August 31, 2017.

The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.



Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2016 ($1,373,462)
2017 ($1,626,229)
2018 ($1,631,582)
2019 ($1,637,057)
2020 ($1,642,648)




Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from
General Revenue Fund
1
Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from
Texas Emissions Reduction Plan
5071
Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from
State Highway Fund
6
Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from
Texas Mobility Fund
365
2016 ($1,373,462) ($6,875,770) $19,546,042 ($6,875,770)
2017 ($1,626,229) ($6,875,680) ($2,741,520) ($6,875,680)
2018 ($1,631,582) ($6,875,590) ($2,790,336) ($6,875,590)
2019 ($1,637,057) ($6,875,500) ($2,839,544) ($6,875,500)
2020 ($1,642,648) ($6,880,000) ($3,440,243) ($6,875,395)

Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from
Counties
2016 $2,992,660
2017 ($3,606,739)
2018 ($3,679,867)
2019 ($3,753,995)
2020 ($3,829,025)

Fiscal Analysis

The bill would amend Section 502.0023, to change the $10 registration fee for commercial fleet vehicles from annual to a one-time fee and amend Section 502.255 to change the annual $15 registration fee for certain semitrailers to a one-time fee of $105.

The bill would amend Chapters 501 and 502 of the Transportation Code to provide for the titling and registration of an autocycle, as defined by the bill. An autocycle would be treated as a motorcycle for the purpose of vehicle titling and registration.

The bill would amend provisions in Chapter 548 of the Transportation Code, relating to the inspection of vehicles, to exempt from the application of the safety inspection program vehicles with gross weight rating of more than 10,000 pounds and vehicles subject to inspection under 49 C.F.R. Part 396 (relating to inspection and maintenance of commercial motor vehicles).

The bill would amend the Transportation Code to authorize the DMV to issue a 24-hour permit for the operation of certain vehicles with excess axle or gross weight with a fee of $50. Applicants would be directed to designate no more than five counties in which the vehicle could operate when applying for the permit. Of the revenue from the new fee, 50 percent would be deposited to the credit the State Highway Fund and the remaining 50 percent would be distributed to the counties designated in the permit application.

The bill would authorize a motor carrier whose registration has been suspended or revoked to apply for a re-registration from the DMV by paying a fee of $10 for each vehicle requiring re-registration. 

Except as otherwise specified, the bill would take effect on September 1, 2015.

Methodology

The bill would change the annual commercial fleet extended registration fee from annual amount of $10 per fleet vehicle to a one-time $10 per vehicle fee. Based on the information and analysis provided by the DMV it is assumed 12,712 fleet vehicles would register for a new 4-year extended registration period for a fee of $10 per vehicle per year under current law, beginning in fiscal year 2016, and the number current commercial fleet vehicles registered would increase by 2.25 percent each fiscal year with the number of years in the extended registration period decreasing by one year in each successive year. Under the proposed legislation, DMV estimates the same number of fleet vehicles would register and pay the one-time $10 per vehicle fee in each fiscal year, and an additional 8,000 vehicles each year would apply for commercial fleet registration as a result of the change to a one-time fee. Based on the analysis of the DMV it is assumed this provision of the bill would result in a in a revenue loss to the SHF of $300,360 in fiscal year 2016 followed by an average annual revenue gain of approximately $75,000 in the following three fiscal years. It is assumed a similar cycle of revenue losses and gains would recur every four years thereafter.

Based on the information and analysis provided by the DMV, it is assumed approximately 280 autocycle vehicles would be issued titles at a fee of $28 and registered at the motorcycle registration fee of $30, plus other state and county fees due at the time of registration, in fiscal year 2016. Based on this analysis, it is assumed the titling of autocycles would result in revenue gains of approximately $2,256 to General Revenue, $4,230 to the Texas Mobility Fund (TMF), and $1,410 to the counties beginning in fiscal year 2016; and autocycle registrations would result in annual revenue gains of $3,200 to the General Revenue Fund, $7,642 to the SHF, and $3,920 to the counties in beginning in fiscal year 2016.  Based on the analysis of the DMV, it is assumed approximately 300 autocycle titles would be issued each year thereafter and the number of autocycles registered would increase by approximately 300 vehicles each year thereafter.

Pursuant to current provisions in Transportation Code, Section 501.138 (b-2), the Texas Department of Transportation would be required to remit to the Comptroller for deposit to the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP) Fund an amount of revenue from the non-constitutionally dedicated portion of the SHF equal to the amount of title fee revenue deposited to the TMF. Therefore, it is assumed the revenue gain to the TMF from title fees on autocycles would result in the transfer of an additional amount out of the SHF into the TERP Fund equal to the revenue gain to the TMF beginning in fiscal year 2016 and continuing through fiscal year 2019 when Section 501.138 (b-2) is set to expire.

Based on the information provided by the Department of Public Safety (DPS), it is assumed the provisions of the bill would exempt commercial motor vehicles from the state vehicle safety inspection program requirements. DPS estimates that approximately 688,000 were performed in fiscal year 2014 and that a similar number of inspections would be performed in each fiscal year thereafter. For each commercial motor vehicle inspection, $2 is deposited to General Revenue, $10 to the TERP Fund, $10 to the TMF. Based on the analysis provided by DPS, it is assumed the exemption from inspection requirements would result in annual revenue losses of $1.4 million to General Revenue, $6.9 million to the TERP Fund, and $6.9 million to the TMF.

Based on the analysis of the DMV, it is assumed 253,103 semitrailers would register by paying the one-time $105 registration fee established by the bill in fiscal year 2016 instead of the $15 annual fee, with an incremental increase the number of registrations of 2.25 percent per year thereafter, resulting in revenue gains of approximately $19.8 million to the SHF and $3 million to the counties in fiscal year 2016 and revenue losses of approximately $3 million to the SHF and $3 million to the counties beginning in fiscal year 2017. Based on the analysis of the DMV it is assumed the revenue losses would continue at similar levels each year thereafter.

Based on information provided by the DMV, it is assumed 1,041 of the 24-hour over axle/gross weight permits would be issued in fiscal year 2016 at a fee of $50, with the number of permits issued increasing in alignment with the number of annual permits issued (15.9 percent each year). Therefore, it is assumed issuance of the new permit would result in a total revenue gain to the state and the counties of $52,050 beginning in fiscal year 2016, increasing by 15.9 percent each year thereafter. The fee revenue would be allocated to the SHF and 50 percent to the counties designated on the permit application.

Because there is insufficient data to estimate the number of motor carriers with suspended or revoked registrationsrom the DMV at new fee of $10 per vehicle, the potential revenue impact cannot be determined at this time.  Based on the information provided by the DMV, it is assumed this provision of the bill would not result in a significant impact to state revenue.

Note: This legislation would do one or more of the following: create or recreate a dedicated account in the General Revenue Fund, create or recreate a special or trust fund either with or outside of the Treasury, or create a dedicated revenue source. The fund, account, or revenue dedication included in this bill would be subject to funds consolidation review by the current Legislature.

Note:  This legislation would reduce, rescind, or repeal the dedication of a specific source or portion of revenue dedicated to the Texas Mobility Fund. Article 3, Section 49-k, of the Texas Constitution, specifies that while money in the Texas Mobility Fund is pledged for the payment of any outstanding debt obligations, the Legislature may not reduce, rescind, or repeal the dedication of a specific source or portion of revenue dedicated to the Texas Mobility Fund unless the Legislature by law dedicates a substitute or different source of revenue that is projected by the Comptroller to be of a value equal to or greater than the source or amount being reduced, rescinded, or repealed.

Technology

It is assumed any costs associated with implementing the provisions of the bill on or after January 1, 2016, (delayed implementation) could be absorbed within the agency's existing resources.  However, the DMV indicates that implementation of the bill by September 1, 2015, would require programming changes to the agency's legacy core Registration and Titling System (RTS) during the months of June and July of 2015, which would delay the development and implementation of the agency's ongoing RTS Refactoring Project. The DMV estimates the programming changes necessary to implement the provisions of the bill on the specified effective date could result in a four month delay in the RTS Refactoring Project, which could result in significant additional project costs.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.


Source Agencies:
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 405 Department of Public Safety, 601 Department of Transportation, 608 Department of Motor Vehicles, 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 360 State Office of Administrative Hearings
LBB Staff:
UP, AG, NV, TG