BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 31 |
By: Larson |
Natural Resources |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that certain groundwater conservation districts have violated private property rights by unduly impeding, delaying, or denying the issuance of groundwater permits. C.S.H.B. 31 seeks to address this issue by making certain statutory changes relating to the regulation of groundwater.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 31 amends the Water Code to limit the authorization for a groundwater conservation district to require that certain specified components be included in a well permit or well permit amendment application to requiring that only those components be included in such an application as applicable under district rules. The bill includes as such a component other information reasonably related to an issue that a district is authorized to consider under certain provisions of law and included in a district rule in effect on the date the application is submitted that specifies what information must be included in an application for a determination of administrative completeness. The bill replaces as one of the considerations a district is required to make before granting or denying certain permits or permit amendments the consideration of whether the proposed use of water unreasonably affects existing groundwater and surface water resources or existing permit holders with a consideration of whether the projected effect of the proposed production unreasonably affects aquifer conditions, depletion, or subsidence, existing groundwater and surface water resources, or existing permit holders. The bill replaces a provision establishing that an administratively complete application requires information set forth in accordance with provisions relating to well permits, permit amendments, and permit elements with a provision making an application administratively complete if it contains the information set forth under such provisions. The bill prohibits a district from requiring that additional information be included in an application for a determination of administrative completeness. The bill makes district rules in effect on the date an application for a permit or a permit amendment is submitted to the district the only district rules that may govern the district's decision to grant or deny the application.
C.S.H.B. 31 revises provisions relating to the export of groundwater out of a district. The bill prohibits a district from requiring a separate permit for the export of groundwater for use outside of the district. The bill changes the exception to the prohibition against a district imposing more restrictive requirements or conditions on exporters than the district imposes on in-district users from an exception as provided by provisions relating to historic users to an exception as provided by provisions relating to export fees and surcharges. The bill requires a term for an export permit that existed on May 29, 2017, to automatically be extended on or before its expiration to a term that is not shorter than the term of an operating permit for the production of water to be exported that is in effect at the time of the extension and for each additional term for which that operating permit for production is renewed or remains in effect under certain provisions. The bill establishes that a term automatically extended continues to be subject to conditions contained in the permit as issued before the automatic extension. The bill repeals provisions relating to the issuance and terms and conditions of a permit for the export of groundwater out of a district.
C.S.H.B. 31 prohibits a district from adopting a moratorium on the issuance of a permit or permit amendment unless the district complies with applicable notice and hearing procedures and makes written findings supporting the district's determination regarding the issuance, including the district's justification for imposing the moratorium, if applicable. The bill provides for the notice and public hearing requirements, the imposition of a temporary moratorium, and the expiration of a moratorium.
C.S.H.B. 31 prohibits a moratorium on the issuance of a permit or permit amendment that is adopted by a district before September 1, 2017, from continuing in effect after November 30, 2017. The bill provides for the validation and confirmation of certain permits to export groundwater approved by districts before the bill's effective date. To the extent of any conflict, the bill expressly prevails over another act of the 85th Legislature, Regular Session, 2017, relating to changes to Water Code groundwater conservation district provisions or nonsubstantive additions to and corrections in enacted codes.
C.S.H.B. 31 repeals Sections 36.122(f), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), (l), (m), (n), (o), (p), and (q), Water Code.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 31 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|