BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 66 |
By: Guillen |
Defense & Veterans' Affairs |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that if a student appointed to receive a Texas Armed Services Scholarship loses eligibility for the scholarship, the appointing official is unable to make another appointment until the next year. C.S.H.B. 66 seeks to address this issue by allowing an appointing official, should the first student lose eligibility, to award the scholarship's remaining funds to another eligible student beginning with the next academic year.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 66 amends the Education Code to change the entity making the determination about whether a student receiving a scholarship under the Texas armed services scholarship program has maintained satisfactory academic progress to continue to receive the scholarship from the institution in which the student is enrolled to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. The bill authorizes the elected official who appointed a student to receive an initial scholarship under the program who the coordinating board determines has failed to maintain eligibility or otherwise meet the requirements to continue receiving the scholarship to appoint, beginning with the academic year following the determination, another student eligible for scholarship funds under that program to receive any available funds designated for the student who no longer meets the scholarship requirements.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 66 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|