BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 462 |
By: Dale |
Government Transparency & Operation |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties question whether state agencies make rules that go beyond the scope of the original intent of the legislation that grants them rulemaking authority. C.S.H.B. 462 seeks to make legislators aware of how legislation granting such authority is ultimately implemented by requiring a state agency's notice of proposed rulemaking to include the bill number for the legislation providing the relevant rulemaking authority and by requiring the agency to provide that notice to each primary author, joint author, sponsor, and joint sponsor of that legislation.
|
||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 462 amends the Government Code to include among the required contents of the notice of a proposed rule by a state agency subject to the Administrative Procedure Act the bill number for the legislation that enacted the statutory or other authority under which the rule is proposed to be adopted, in addition to other existing requirements. The bill requires such a state agency, on the same day the agency files the required notice of the proposed rule with the secretary of state, to provide notice of the proposed rule to each primary author, any joint author, each sponsor, and any joint sponsor of the legislation that enacted the statutory or other authority under which the proposed rule is to be adopted and requires the agency to provide that notice electronically if the recipient of the notice has provided an email address to the agency for the purpose of receiving the notice. The bill establishes that failure to provide such notice does not invalidate a rule adopted by a state agency or an action taken by the agency under that rule.
|
||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 462 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||
|