BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 486 |
By: VanDeaver |
Ways & Means |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that the requirement for a school district to hold an election for the approval of the district's adoption of a tax rate that exceeds the district's rollback tax rate deters districts seeking to lower their tax rate and is financially burdensome as an election must be held even when a school district is attempting to reduce the tax rate to a rate that is still above the rollback tax rate. C.S.H.B. 486 seeks to address these concerns by providing an alternative means to determine certain school districts' rollback tax rate for purposes of an election to ratify school tax rates.
|
||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 486 amends the Tax Code to establish that, for purposes of an election to ratify school taxes, the rollback tax rate of a public school district whose maintenance and operations (M&O) tax rate for the 2005 tax year was $1.50 or less per $100 of taxable value and whose adopted tax rate was approved at an election in the 2006 tax year or any subsequent tax year is the higher of the amount provided by state law or the sum of the district's current debt rate and the highest M&O tax rate adopted by the district for the 2007 tax year or any subsequent tax year in which the district's adopted tax rate was approved at an election to ratify school taxes. This provision applies only to such a school district that has adopted a tax rate equal to or higher than the rollback tax rate for any tax year in the preceding 10 tax years and expressly does not apply to a school district if the district's adopted tax rate in the 2007 tax year or a subsequent tax year before the 2016 tax year was approved at a ratifying election and the M&O tax rate adopted by the district for that tax year was higher than the sum of the rate per $100 of taxable value that is equal to the product of the state compression percentage for the current year and $1.50 and the rate of $0.04 per $100 of taxable value; the district adopted a M&O tax rate in the 2016 tax year that was lower than the highest M&O tax rate adopted by the district for a tax year in which the district's adopted tax rate was approved at a ratifying election in such a tax year and higher than the sum of those rates; and the district's adopted tax rate has not been approved at a ratifying election since the 2016 tax year.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
January 1, 2018.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 486 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|