BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 578 |
By: Turner |
General Investigating & Ethics |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that the reasons for which a state employee may be granted emergency leave by the administrative head of an applicable state agency are unclear and that this ambiguity has resulted in the granting of emergency leave as a form of severance pay. C.S.H.B. 578 seeks to clarify this issue by providing for certain conditions under which an administrative head may grant such leave, including leave for an employee who is the subject of an agency investigation.
|
||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 578 amends the Government Code to condition the requirement that the administrative head of an applicable state agency grant an emergency leave to a state employee who the administrative head determines has shown good cause for taking emergency leave on the condition that the employee requests the leave and to prohibit the administrative head from granting such emergency leave to an employee unless the administrative head believes in good faith that the employee being granted the emergency leave intends to return to the employee's position with the agency on expiration of the period of emergency leave. The bill establishes that an employee is not required to request an emergency leave if the administrative head grants the emergency leave because the agency is closed due to weather conditions or in observance of a holiday.
C.S.H.B. 578 authorizes the administrative head of an applicable state agency to grant leave without a deduction in salary to a state employee who is the subject of an investigation being conducted by the agency. The bill makes a state employee who is the subject of an investigation being conducted by the employing agency ineligible to receive leave for that reason under any other provision regarding miscellaneous leave provisions for state employees. The bill requires an applicable state agency to submit a report to the comptroller of public accounts and the Legislative Budget Board not later than the last day of each quarter of a state fiscal year that includes the name of each of employee of the employing agency who has been granted 168 hours or more of leave due to the employee being the subject of an investigation conducted by the agency during that fiscal quarter. The bill requires such a report to include, for each employee, a brief statement as to the reason the employee remains on leave.
C.S.H.B. 578 requires the comptroller to adopt a uniform system for use by each applicable state agency to report leave taken by the agency's employees as part of the centralized accounting and payroll system or any successor system used to implement the enterprise resource planning component of the uniform statewide accounting project. The bill requires such uniform system to include standardized accounting codes for each type of leave authorized under state law.
|
||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 578 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||
|