BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 669 |
By: Canales |
Criminal Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Concerned observers note the difficulty in determining the originating courts of certain court orders. C.S.H.B. 669 seeks to address this issue by requiring signed court orders to include the magistrate's name in legible handwriting, legible typewritten form, or legible stamp print.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 669 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to require any signed order that is issued by a magistrate under that code or any signed order pertaining to a criminal matter that is issued by a magistrate under other state law to include, with the magistrate's signature, the magistrate's name in legible handwriting, legible typewritten form, or legible stamp print.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 669 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|