BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 923 |
By: Shaheen |
Business & Industry |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties are
concerned that property owners' associations are able to charge fines for
restrictive covenant violations that are excessive in light of the severity
of the violation.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 923 amends the Property Code to require a property owners' association board to adopt a policy regarding the enforcement of fines assessed by the property owners' association and to require such a policy to disclose each type of violation for which the board may assess a fine, the amount of the fine for each type of violation, and pertinent information regarding hearings held before the board or a committee appointed by the board for purposes of discussing and resolving a violation. The bill requires the amount of such a fine to be reasonable in the context of the nature and frequency of the violation and the effect of the violation on the subdivision as a whole. The bill requires each property owners' association to file a copy of the association's adopted policy and each subsequent amendment with the county clerk of each county in which the subdivision is located and to provide a copy of the policy to an owner of each property in the subdivision by either posting the policy on a website maintained by the association or by annually sending a copy of the policy, separately or included in routine communication from the association to property owners, by one of the methods of delivery specified by the bill.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 923 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|