BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 929 |
By: Miller |
Elections |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that recent legislative efforts to strengthen military absentee voting in Texas did not provide adequate time for those absentee ballots to be received and counted. C.S.H.B. 929 seeks to address this issue by extending the deadline for the arrival of ballots voted by mail under certain circumstances.
|
||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 929 amends the Election Code to require a ballot voted early by mail as a federal postcard by a person who is a member of the U.S. armed forces or of the U.S. merchant marine, or the spouse or a dependent of such a member, to be counted if the ballot arrives at the address on the carrier envelope not later than the sixth day after the election date, but if that date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal state or national holiday, to extend the deadline to the next regular business day. The bill makes the requirements relating to the period within which the local canvass must occur for an election held on the uniform election date in May applicable instead to the period within which each local canvassing authority is required to convene at the time set by the canvassing authority's presiding officer to conduct the local canvass for an election other than an election held on the date of the general election for state and county officers.
C.S.H.B. 929 repeals Section 67.003(a), Election Code.
|
||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 929 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||
|