BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1023 |
By: Simmons |
Public Education |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
According to interested parties, no more than one charter can be granted to the charter holder of an open-enrollment charter school, and the parties suggest that this limitation might discourage charter schools from establishing certain specialized academic programs. C.S.H.B. 1023 seeks to address this issue by authorizing the granting of additional charters for certain open-enrollment charter schools.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1023 amends the Education Code to require the commissioner of education, on written request from a charter holder, to grant a charter for an open-enrollment charter school to a charter holder if the additional charter is for an open-enrollment charter school that will continue a campus operated by the charter holder and, as of January 1, 2013, the campus primarily serves students with disabilities or provides a full-time online program eligible for foundation school program funding. The bill requires the commissioner to grant such a charter not later than the 30th day after the date the commissioner receives the request from a charter holder.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1023 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|