BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1102 |
By: Hernandez |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties are concerned that juror contact information listed in the jury wheel is insufficient to assemble an adequate number of prospective jurors for service. C.S.H.B. 1102 seeks to help secure more jurors for service by including an eligible juror's telephone number when available on such a juror's jury wheel card.
|
||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1102 amends the Government Code to include each applicable registered voter's telephone number, if available, in the current voter registration list the voter registrar of each county is required to furnish to the secretary of state for the purpose of reconstituting the county jury wheel and in the list contracted for by the commissioners court of a county under certain circumstances for such purpose. The bill requires telephone numbers, if available, of qualified prospective jurors to be written or typed, as applicable, on jury wheel cards.
C.S.H.B. 1102 amends the Election Code to make a telephone number furnished on a voter registration application confidential and to establish that such a telephone number does not constitute public information for purposes of state public information law. The bill prohibits the secretary of state from furnishing information in the statewide computerized voter registration list that includes a voter's telephone number.
|
||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1102 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||
|