BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1268 |
By: Schaefer |
Criminal Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties believe that an attorney representing the state should have a reasonable opportunity to question a grand juror for purposes of determining whether the juror may be challenged for certain causes. C.S.H.B. 1268 seeks to provide this opportunity.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1268 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to require a court to allow the attorney representing the state a reasonable opportunity to question a grand juror in order to determine whether the juror may be challenged for certain specified causes.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1268 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|