BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1357 |
By: Moody |
Criminal Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties believe that the punishment for cruelty to a nonlivestock animal is inadequate and that the existing penalty enhancement framework for such an offense is overly complicated. C.S.H.B. 1357 seeks to address these concerns by increasing certain related punishments and simplifying related penalty enhancements.
|
||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill expressly does one or more of the following: creates a criminal offense, increases the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or changes the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1357 amends the Penal Code to change the circumstances that trigger the enhancement of the penalty for a Class A misdemeanor cruelty to a nonlivestock animal offense to a state jail felony from the actor having previously been convicted two times of cruelty to a nonlivestock animal, convicted two times of cruelty to a livestock animal, or convicted one time of cruelty to a nonlivestock animal and one time of cruelty to a livestock animal to the actor having previously been convicted of either such offense. The bill increases from a state jail felony to a third degree felony the penalty for a cruelty to a nonlivestock animal offense that involves torturing an animal, in a cruel manner killing or causing serious bodily injury to an animal, or killing, administering poison to, or causing serious bodily injury to an animal without the owner's effective consent and further enhances the penalty for such an offense to a second degree felony if the person has previously been convicted of such an offense, of causing one animal to fight with another animal if either animal is not a dog, of using a live animal as a lure in dog race training or in dog coursing on a racetrack, or of cruelty to a livestock animal. The bill changes the circumstances that trigger the enhancement of the penalty for a state jail felony cruelty to a nonlivestock animal offense involving such an unlawful animal fight or lure to a third degree felony from the actor having previously been convicted two times of cruelty to a nonlivestock animal, convicted two times of cruelty to a livestock animal, or convicted one time of cruelty to a nonlivestock animal and one time of cruelty to a livestock animal to the actor having previously been convicted of either such offense. The bill replaces the exception for certain conduct from the application of the offense of cruelty to a nonlivestock animal with a defense to prosecution for such conduct.
C.S.H.B. 1357 amends the Health and Safety Code to establish that it is not a defense to prosecution for cruelty to a nonlivestock animal that the actor's conduct was authorized under statutory provisions relating to dogs or coyotes that attack animals.
C.S.H.B. 1357 repeals Section 821.023(b), Health and Safety Code, which makes a statement of an owner made at a hearing regarding the disposition or return of an allegedly cruelly treated animal inadmissible in a criminal trial of the owner for cruelty to a livestock or nonlivestock animal.
|
||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1357 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||
|