BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1449 |
By: Simmons |
Ways & Means |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that fees levied on new construction by political subdivisions significantly increase the cost of new housing and other construction across Texas. These parties also contend that it is in the state's best interest to limit regulatory burdens on the housing industry in order to increase housing affordability for all Texans. C.S.H.B. 1449 seeks to address this issue by prohibiting a political subdivision from adopting or enforcing a regulation that imposes certain fees, charges, or demands on new construction.
|
||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1449 amends the Local Government Code to prohibit a political subdivision from adopting or enforcing a regulation that imposes, directly or indirectly, a fee, charge, or demand on new construction for the purposes of offsetting the cost or rent of any unit of residential housing. This prohibition expressly does not apply to a residential density bonus program in which a zoning waiver is issued for a voluntary fee payment or the voluntary provision of affordable housing or other defined public benefit. The bill nullifies and voids a regulation adopted by a political subdivision that conflicts with the bill's provisions.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1449 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|