BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1463 |
By: Smithee |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that certain entities have become the target of frivolous lawsuits under state law prohibiting discrimination against persons with disabilities that represent an attempt to force the entity to settle claims for alleged minor violations to avoid expending time and resources to defend itself in court. C.S.H.B. 1463 seeks to reduce the negative impact of such lawsuits by requiring a claimant to give notice to such an entity of intent to file a claim under the act and by providing the entity an opportunity to correct the violation before judicial intervention.
|
||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1463 amends the Human Resources Code to require a claimant filing or intending to file an action alleging a violation of statutory prohibitions against discrimination based on a person's disability and alleging a failure to comply with applicable design, construction, technical, or similar standards, including website accessibility guidelines, to accommodate persons with disabilities to give written notice of the claim to the respondent not later than the 60th day before the date the action is filed. The bill sets out the required contents of the written notice, which may be given in a manner prescribed for service of process in a civil action, and prohibits the notice from demanding a sum of damages, requesting settlement, or offering to settle the claim without a determination of whether a condition stated in the notice is excused by law or may be remedied.
C.S.H.B. 1463 authorizes a respondent who has received such a written notice to correct the alleged violation before the earliest date on which the claimant may file the action. The bill requires a respondent who has so corrected to provide a notice of the correction to the claimant that describes each correction and the manner in which the correction addresses the alleged violation. The bill requires a respondent who concludes that an alleged violation has not occurred and that a correction is not necessary to provide the claimant an explanation of the respondent's conclusion. The bill authorizes such a notice of correction or explanation to be given in a manner prescribed for service of process in a civil action.
C.S.H.B. 1463 requires a claimant who files an action to which the bill's provisions apply to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent has not corrected one or more of the alleged violations stated in the written notice of intent to file a claim. The bill authorizes a respondent against whom an action is filed to file a plea in abatement and to request an evidentiary hearing on the plea. The bill requires the court to abate the action for a period not to exceed 60 days after the date of the hearing if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent initiated action to correct the alleged violation during the time allowed under the bill's provisions, that the respondent could not complete the corrections within that time, and that the corrections will be completed by the end of the period of abatement. The bill authorizes a claimant to file a motion to dismiss the action without prejudice, and authorizes a respondent to file a motion for summary judgment in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, if the respondent has provided a notice of correction or has completed corrections during a period of abatement.
|
||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1463 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||
|