BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1725 |
By: Hernandez |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that certain persons may abuse state public information law to obtain the personal information of individuals who receive a traffic citation, which is then used in the commission of conduct constituting barratry. C.S.H.B. 1725 seeks to combat this exploitative practice by excepting certain personal information contained in a traffic citation from the public-availability requirement of state public information law.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1725 amends the Government Code to except information contained in a citation issued for a violation of a state traffic law or local traffic ordinance from the public-availability requirement of state public information law if the information is the home address or personal telephone number of the person who is the subject of a citation. The bill requires such information to be made available on the request of a radio or television station that holds a license issued by the Federal Communications Commission or a newspaper that is a free newspaper of general circulation or qualified under state law to publish certain legal notices, that is published at least once a week, and that is available and of interest to the general public in connection with the dissemination of news.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2017.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1725 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|