BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1791 |
By: Pickett |
Transportation |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note an increased use of connected braking technology by major truck fleets in the United States, whereby a convoy of two vehicles are linked together wirelessly so the rear vehicle can control its speed based on the behavior of the front vehicle, surrounding traffic, and weather conditions. The parties report that several state and federal agencies, research institutes and private sector companies have participated in various projects demonstrating how connected braking technology improves safe driving conditions for the vehicles using the technology as well as surrounding vehicles. C.S.H.B. 1791 seeks to provide clarity in the law regarding the use of connected braking systems in Texas.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1791 amends the Transportation Code to authorize an operator of a vehicle equipped with a connected braking system that is following another vehicle equipped with that system to be assisted by the system to maintain the required assured clear distance or sufficient space. The bill defines "connected braking system" as a system by which the braking of one vehicle is electronically coordinated with the braking system of a following vehicle.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2017.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1791 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|