BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1793 |
By: Pickett |
Transportation |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
There are concerns that many Texas trucks and trailers registered as commercial motor vehicles are not domiciled in Texas, which forces those vehicles to travel long distances to obtain the required valid annual inspection. Reports indicate that the expense of this obligation, especially considering driver wages and per diems, fuel, and the necessary downtime for the trucks and trailers, may be forcing some in the industry to register their fleets in states that have less burdensome registration and inspection requirements, resulting in a loss of revenue to the state. C.S.H.B. 1793 seeks to address these concerns by exempting certain vehicles registered under the International Registration Plan registered in Texas but domiciled outside Texas from the state's compulsory annual inspection under certain conditions.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1793 amends the Transportation Code to exempt from compulsory vehicle inspection requirements a commercial motor vehicle that is not domiciled in Texas, is registered in Texas or under the International Registration Plan, and has been issued a certificate of inspection in compliance with federal motor carrier safety regulations. The bill subjects such a commercial motor vehicle to any fees established by the Transportation Code that would apply to the vehicle if the vehicle were subject to those inspection requirements.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2017.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1793 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|