BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1884 |
By: Anderson, Charles "Doc" |
Criminal Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties claim that illegal dumping and littering cost the state significant amounts every year and note that some defendants convicted of similar offenses are required to perform community service by picking up litter or working at a recycling facility. C.S.H.B. 1884 seeks to include a person convicted of a certain littering or illegal dumping offense among those required to perform such community service.
|
||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1884 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Health and Safety Code to require a court to require a defendant, in addition to any fine or other penalty, to perform community service that consists of picking up litter or working at a recycling facility, as applicable, on conviction of an offense involving illegal dumping, discarding lighted material, disposal of litter or certain other substances in a cave, or a violation of a Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rule regarding processing and treating litter disposed of in an illegal manner. The bill changes the amount of such community service that a judge is so required to order from 60 hours of service to an amount of service ordered by the court, which may not exceed 60 hours.
|
||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1884 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||
|