BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1892 |
By: Ortega |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that court proceedings for substandard buildings can take several years to be resolved, often posing further risks to public health and safety as the buildings may become even more dangerous while the judicial process is ongoing. C.S.H.B. 1892 seeks to remedy this situation by requiring the expedition of any court proceeding, including an appeal, relating to certain health and safety municipal ordinances and substandard-building determinations made by a municipality.
|
||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1892 amends the Local Government Code to require a court to expedite any proceeding, including an appeal, related to a suit brought for the enforcement of a municipal health and safety ordinance relating to dangerously damaged or deteriorated structures or improvements or related to a substandard building determination made by a municipality. The bill establishes that appeals of such suits are governed by the procedures for accelerated appeals in civil cases under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and requires the appellate court to render the applicable final order or judgment with the least possible delay.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1892 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|