BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1936 |
By: Springer |
State Affairs |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that governmental entities should not support entities that provide abortions with taxpayer funds. C.S.H.B. 1936 seeks to address this issue by prohibiting a governmental entity from entering into certain transactions or a contract with certain abortion providers or affiliates.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1936 amends the Government Code to prohibit a governmental entity from entering into a taxpayer resource transaction or contract with an abortion provider, defined by the bill as a licensed abortion facility or a licensed ambulatory surgical center that is used substantially for the purpose of performing abortions, or with an affiliate, as defined by the bill, of an abortion provider. This prohibition expressly does not apply to a taxpayer resource transaction that involves a federal law that conflicts with the prohibition as determined by the executive commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission and confirmed in writing by the attorney general. The bill authorizes the attorney general to bring an action in the name of the state to enjoin a violation of the prohibition and to recover reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in bringing such an action and waives the sovereign or governmental immunity, as applicable, of a governmental entity to suit and from liability to the extent of liability created by that authorization. The bill establishes that for purposes of its provisions a facility is not considered to be an abortion provider solely on the basis that an abortion is performed at the facility during a medical emergency.
C.S.H.B. 1936 defines, among other terms, "abortion" as an act or procedure performed after pregnancy has been medically verified and with the intent to cause the termination of a pregnancy other than for the purpose of either the birth of a live fetus or removing a dead fetus, not including birth control devices or oral contraceptives, and defines "taxpayer resource transaction" as a sale, purchase, lease, donation of money, goods, services, or real property, or any other transaction between a governmental entity and a private entity that provides to the private entity something of value derived directly or indirectly from state or local tax revenue, regardless of whether the governmental entity receives something of value in return. The bill expressly excludes the provision of basic governmental services, including fire and police protection, from the meaning of "taxpayer resource transaction."
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1936 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|