BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2051 |
By: Huberty |
Public Education |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that it has been too long since the base amount of the new instructional facility allotment under the foundation school program has been updated and that current eligibility criteria are too narrow for available funding to be fully utilized. C.S.H.B. 2051 seeks to increase the allotment to address the increased costs to school districts of operating new facilities and to extend eligibility for additional types of facilities.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2051 amends the Education Code to increase from $250 to $1,000 the base amount of the new instructional facility allotment to which a public school district is entitled. The bill entitles a district that is entitled to receive allotment funding in the 2017-2018 school year for the second year of student attendance at a new instructional facility to the amount, for that year, provided for the second year of student attendance as a result of the changes in law made by the bill. The bill includes as facilities considered to be a new instructional facility for purposes of the allotment a newly constructed instructional facility, a repurposed instructional facility, and a leased facility operating for the first time as an instructional facility with a minimum lease term of not less than 10 years.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017. |
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2051 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|