BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2069 |
By: Shaheen |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties believe that individuals who report suspicious activity to law enforcement in good faith are inadequately protected from civil liability relating to such a report. C.S.H.B. 2069 seeks to address this issue by establishing a limitation on civil suits against persons reporting suspicious activity in good faith.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2069 amends the Civil Practice and Remedies Code to prohibit a civil action related to a report of suspicious activity of another person to an appropriate law enforcement authority from being brought against the person who made the report if the person acted as a reasonable person would in the same or similar circumstances and with a reasonable belief that the suspicious activity constituted or was in furtherance of a crime, including an act of terrorism.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2069 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|