BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2124 |
By: Minjarez |
Human Services |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties have expressed a need to support the development of more consistent memoranda of understanding between the U.S. Department of Defense Family Advocacy Program and state and local child welfare services to improve coordination of local child welfare and military protective rehabilitative services in support of military children and families. C.S.H.B. 2124 seeks to address this issue by requiring the Department of Family and Protective Services, in an investigation of a report of abuse or neglect allegedly committed by a person responsible for a child's care, custody, or welfare who is determined to be an active duty member of the U.S. armed forces or the spouse of such a person, to notify the U.S. Department of Defense Family Advocacy Program of the investigation.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2124 amends the Family Code to require the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS), in an investigation of a report of abuse or neglect allegedly committed by a person responsible for a child's care, custody, or welfare, to determine whether the person is an active duty member of the U.S. armed forces or the spouse of a member on active duty, and, if DFPS determines the person is an active duty member of the U.S. armed forces or the spouse of a member on active duty, to notify the U.S. Department of Defense Family Advocacy Program at the closest active duty military installation of the investigation.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2124 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|