BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2250 |
By: Darby |
Ways & Means |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties maintain that certain companies engaged in business relating to renting work uniforms have been improperly classified for franchise tax purposes because the industry groups under which they operate are not expressly listed in the definition of "retail trade" in relation to that tax. C.S.H.B. 2250 seeks to remedy this situation by adding certain uniform rental activities to the definition of "retail trade" for franchise tax purposes.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2250 amends the Tax Code to include in the definition of "retail trade" for franchise tax purposes certain activities involving the rental of industrial uniforms, industrial garments, and industrial linen supplies that are classified by the 1987 Standard Industrial Classification Manual published by the federal Office of Management and Budget as specified by the bill.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
January 1, 2019.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2250 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|