BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2366 |
By: Davis, Yvonne |
Transportation |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that certain airport security vehicles are not recognized by state law as emergency vehicles. C.S.H.B. 2366 seeks to address this issue by including an emergency management or airport security vehicle owned or leased by certain airports among the vehicles classified as authorized emergency vehicles for purposes of the laws governing the rules of the road.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2366 amends the Transportation Code to authorize a motor vehicle that has been designated or authorized by, and is owned or leased by, a joint airport board to be equipped with flashing blue and amber lights visible from directly in front of the center of the vehicle.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2366 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|