BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2557 |
By: Miller |
Transportation |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties call for improvements to Texas ports and related transportation infrastructure to accommodate increased trade resulting from recent improvements to the Panama Canal. C.S.H.B. 2557 seeks to address this issue by providing for the development of certain rail facilities and the issuance of bonds for those facilities.
|
||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2557 amends the Transportation Code to authorize certain counties acting through the commissioners court or a local government corporation to adopt an order that authorizes the county and a navigation district located wholly or partly in the county to develop rail facilities, as defined by the bill, as a qualifying project under Government Code provisions relating to public and private facilities and infrastructure and to issue bonds for rail facilities secured by a pledge of the revenues of the facilities, including contract revenue, grant revenue, or other revenue collected in connection with the facilities. The bill restricts such authority to a county that is adjacent to a county with a population of four million or more, has a population of 300,000 or more, and has created a rural rail transportation district by concurrent order with an adjacent county pursuant to statutory provisions relating to the creation of such a district by more than one county. The bill authorizes a rural rail transportation district to exercise those powers if each county that created the district adopts such an order.
|
||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2557 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||
|