BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2583 |
By: Martinez, "Mando" |
Criminal Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that celebratory gunfire, a random yet preventable occurrence, leads to the injury or death of innocent individuals each year. C.S.H.B. 2583 seeks to address this issue by creating an offense for the reckless discharge of a firearm.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill expressly does one or more of the following: creates a criminal offense, increases the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or changes the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2583 amends the Penal Code to create the Class A misdemeanor offense of reckless discharge of a firearm for a person who knowingly discharges a firearm and is reckless in regard to lacking a reasonable target at the time of discharge. The bill enhances the penalty for the offense to a first degree felony if it is shown on the trial of the offense that serious bodily injury or death was suffered by any person by reason of the commission of the offense. The bill establishes as a defense to prosecution for the offense that the person discharged the firearm at a sport shooting range, while the firearm was loaded with blanks, or while hunting wildlife as licensed, permitted, and otherwise authorized by the Parks and Wildlife Department. The bill authorizes the prosecution of an actor for conduct that constitutes the offense of reckless discharge of a firearm and that also constitutes another Penal Code offense under statutory provisions relating to either offense.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2583 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|