BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2650 |
By: Villalba |
Business & Industry |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that
certain deposits made by a person to join a membership program should not be
treated as abandoned personal property under certain conditions.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2650 amends the Property Code to establish that a membership initiation deposit that is paid to join a club membership program operated by a business that provides a member access to or the use of entertainment, recreation, sports, dining, or social facilities and other related real property is not presumed to be abandoned personal property if the member forfeits the deposit under the terms of an agreement between the member and the business that sold the membership or if the deposit is included as discharge of indebtedness income on the federal income tax return of the business that sold the membership.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2017.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2650 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|