BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3036 |
By: King, Tracy O. |
Environmental Regulation |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that landowners who rely on certain aquifers for water supply or who have real property along certain streams are increasingly concerned about wastewater discharges degrading water quality and negatively impacting property values. C.S.H.B. 3036 seeks to address these concerns by providing for a restriction on permits authorizing direct discharges of waste or pollutants into certain watersheds.
|
||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3036 amends the Water Code to require the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), in considering a permit application by a wastewater treatment facility for the land disposal of wastewater effluent in an area where runoff from precipitation flows into the portion of the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone that is southwest of the Colorado River, to subtract, for the purposes of facility design calculations, the reclaimed water amount from the total volume of effluent in order to determine the area of land required for effluent disposal and the amount of effluent storage required. The bill also requires TCEQ, in considering such a permit application, to adopt a procedure for the applicant to demonstrate the reclaimed water amount that includes provisions to ensure that no unauthorized discharge of effluent to state waters or contamination of groundwater will occur. The bill defines "reclaimed water amount" as the minimum volume of reclaimed water that can be guaranteed to be beneficially reused over a specified time for a particular facility and specifies that the term includes reclaimed water used for indoor or outdoor purposes. The bill establishes that the addition or modification of users or areas used in the land disposal of wastewater effluent in a demonstration of a reclaimed water amount is not a major amendment to the permit if the volume of the reclaimed water amount is not decreased and if the applicant complies with the procedure established by TCEQ for the demonstration of the reclaimed water amount. The bill requires an applicant demonstrating a reclaimed water amount to obtain a beneficial reuse authorization from TCEQ before the operation of the facility.
C.S.H.B. 3036 prohibits TCEQ from issuing a new permit authorizing the direct discharge of waste or pollutants into the Nueces, San Antonio, and Guadalupe River watersheds located in or north and west of the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone or into the portion of the Colorado River watershed located in Blanco, Hays, and Travis Counties that drains to or includes the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone southwest of the Colorado River. The bill prohibits TCEQ from amending a permit issued before September 1, 2017, to authorize an increase in the amount of waste or pollutants that may be directly discharged into any such water. These prohibitions apply only to a permit for the direct discharge of waste or pollutants in the specified geographic area and do not affect definitions related to the Edwards Aquifer as they are used outside these bill provisions. The prohibitions expressly do not apply to on-site sewage disposal systems and do not affect TCEQ authority to authorize stormwater and certain non-stormwater discharges as specified in TCEQ individual permits for municipal separate storm sewer systems and TCEQ general permits for stormwater and associated non-stormwater discharges.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3036 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|