BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3069 |
By: White |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties believe the structure for veterans treatment court programs should more closely resemble the structure that exists for drug courts. C.S.H.B. 3069 seeks to address this issue by revising the administration of and eligibility for participation in a veterans treatment court program.
|
||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3069 amends the Government Code to expand the class of persons for whom a county commissioners court may establish a veterans treatment court program to include a person convicted of or placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for any misdemeanor or felony offense. The bill entitles a person who successfully completes a veterans treatment court program to file with the court that placed the person in the program a petition for an order of nondisclosure of criminal history record information if the person satisfies the requirements in the bill's provisions setting out certain procedures following successful completion of such a program, has never been previously convicted of one of a number of certain offenses ineligible for judge-ordered community supervision or of a sexually violent offense as defined for purposes of the sex offender registration program, and is not convicted of any felony offense between the date on which the person successfully completed the veterans treatment court program and the second anniversary of that date. The bill requires the court to issue an order prohibiting criminal justice agencies from disclosing to the public criminal history record information related to the offense for which a person entered the veterans treatment court program, regardless of whether the person was convicted of or placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for the offense or whether the case against the person was dismissed due to successful completion of the program, after notice to the state, an opportunity for a hearing, and a determination that the person is entitled to file the petition and issuance of the order is in the best interest of justice. The bill authorizes a person to file with the court that placed the person in the veterans treatment court program a petition for such a nondisclosure order only on or after the second anniversary of the date the person successfully completed the program. The bill establishes that a person is not entitled to petition the court for such an order if the person's entry into the veterans treatment court program arose as the result of a conviction for an offense involving the operation of a motor vehicle while intoxicated.
C.S.H.B. 3069 conditions the requirement that a veterans treatment court program ensure that a defendant eligible for participation in the program be provided legal counsel before volunteering to proceed through the program and while participating in the program on there not yet having been a disposition in the criminal case. The bill excepts an order of nondisclosure of criminal history record information under the bill's provisions from statutory provisions setting out certain required conditions for receiving such a nondisclosure order.
C.S.H.B. 3069 establishes that the changes made by the bill's provisions relating to the establishment of a veterans treatment court program and relating to a court order of nondisclosure apply to a person who, on or after the bill's effective date, enters such a program, regardless of whether the person committed the offense for which the person enters the program before, on, or after the bill's effective date.
|
||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3069 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||
|