BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3252 |
By: Thompson, Senfronia |
Transportation |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Informed observers report that traditional transportation revenue sources are in decline and explain that certain transportation authorities are seeking new sources of revenue to make projects more feasible and cost effective. These observers note that financial incentives under certain federal and state laws have established public-private partnerships as a tool for leveraging funding and achieving savings. C.S.H.B. 3252 seeks to address this issue by providing for the applicability of provisions relating to public and private facilities and infrastructure to certain metropolitan rapid transit authorities and for certain contracting requirements.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3252 amends the Government Code to exclude a metropolitan rapid transit authority in which the principal municipality has a population of 1.9 million or more from the exemption from statutory provisions relating to public and private facilities and infrastructure.
C.S.H.B. 3252 amends the Transportation Code to require such a metropolitan rapid transit authority, in procuring architectural, engineering, or design services, to incorporate the selection process defined for those services as provided by the Professional Services Procurement Act.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3252 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|