BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3296 |
By: Klick |
Public Health |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that too few nurses are afforded the protections of a nursing peer review committee when a nurse takes or refuses to take an action on the basis of a nurse's duty to a patient. C.S.H.B. 3296 seeks to extend these protections to more nurses by providing for increased establishment of nursing peer review committees.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3296 amends the Occupations Code to decrease from 10 nurses to eight nurses the minimum number of nurses regularly employed, hired, or contracted for services by a person that triggers the requirement for the person to establish a nursing peer review committee to conduct nursing peer review for vocational nurses. The bill decreases the minimum number of nurses regularly employed, hired, or contracted for services by a person that triggers the requirement for the person to establish a nursing peer review committee to conduct nursing peer review for professional nurses from 10 nurses, at least 5 of whom are registered nurses, to eight nurses, at least four of whom are registered nurses.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3296 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|