BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3419 |
By: Lucio III |
Investments & Financial Services |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that there is a gap in the consumer loan market that makes it difficult for some customers to obtain installment loans within a certain dollar range. C.S.H.B. 3419 seeks to close this gap.
|
||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3419 amends the Finance Code to raise from $200 to $300 the cap on the reference base amount used in the computation of the maximum cash advance of a consumer loan that may provide for an acquisition charge that is not more than $10 and an installment account handling charge that is not more than the ratio of $4 a month for each $100 of cash advance.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3419 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|