BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3561 |
By: Klick |
Human Services |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that foster children, homeless children or youth, and unaccompanied youth experience significant difficulties accessing critical personal documents, identifying and clearing legal barriers to obtain government-issued identification, and securing funds for driver’s education and auto insurance. The parties assert that the failure to obtain a driver’s license or other identification negatively impacts such an individual's ability to participate in age‑appropriate activities, access important opportunities and services, and smoothly transition into normal adult activities. C.S.H.B. 3561 seeks to reduce certain barriers to obtaining such documents and identification for foster children, homeless children or youth, and unaccompanied youth.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3561 amends the Family Code to require a guardian ad litem and an attorney ad litem appointed for a child who is at least 16 years of age in a proceeding under statutory provisions relating to a suit by a governmental entity to protect the health and safety of a child or under statutory provisions relating to a review of the placement of a child under the care of the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) to ascertain whether the child has received a certified copy of the child's birth certificate, a social security card or a replacement social security card, a driver's license or personal identification certificate, and any other personal document DFPS determines appropriate.
C.S.H.B. 3561 requires the court, at each permanency hearing in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship pending or filed on or after the bill's effective date before a final order is rendered, to ask all parties present whether the child or the child's family has a Native American heritage and identify any Native American tribe with which the child may be associated and to determine whether DFPS has provided the child with the child's birth certificate, a social security card or a replacement social security card, a driver's license or personal identification certificate if the child is 16 years of age or older, and the information contained in the child's health passport. The bill specifies that the permanency hearings at which the court is required to review DFPS efforts to ensure that the child has regular, ongoing opportunities to engage in age-appropriate normalcy activities are such hearings held before a final order is rendered. The bill repeals the provision prescribing certain requirements for a court relating to a permanency hearing held before the issuance of a final order in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.
C.S.H.B. 3561 requires the court, at each permanency hearing in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship pending or filed on or after the bill's effective date after the court renders a final order, to determine whether DFPS has provided a child who is 16 years of age or older with the child's birth certificate, a social security card or a replacement social security card, a driver's license or personal identification certificate, the information contained in the child's health passport, proof of the child's enrollment in Medicaid, if appropriate, and written information advising the child of postsecondary education benefits and opportunities available to the child.
C.S.H.B. 3561 amends the Health and Safety Code to require the state registrar of vital statistics, a local registrar, or a county clerk to issue, on request of a homeless child or youth or an unaccompanied youth or a child in the managing conservatorship of DFPS, a certified copy of the child's birth record without fee or parental consent.
C.S.H.B. 3561 amends the Transportation Code to authorize a foster child 16 years of age or older, a homeless child or youth, or an unaccompanied youth, in applying for a personal identification certificate, to provide a copy of the child's or youth's birth certificate as proof of the child's or youth's identity and United States citizenship, as applicable, and, if the child or youth does not have a residence or domicile, to provide a letter from the school district in which the child or youth is enrolled certifying that the child or youth is a homeless child or youth or an unaccompanied youth. The bill authorizes such a child or youth to apply for, and authorizes DPS to issue, a personal identification certificate without the signature or presence of or permission from a parent or guardian of the child or youth. The bill exempts such a child or youth from the payment of any fee for the issuance of a personal identification certificate. The bill extends the exemption from the payment of any fee for the issuance of a driver's license to a homeless child or youth or unaccompanied youth.
C.S.H.B. 3561 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to establish that, for purposes of a waiver of payment of a fine or cost for an indigent defendant or a child, a defendant is presumed to be indigent if the defendant is in the conservatorship of DFPS or was in the conservatorship of DFPS at the time of the offense or if the defendant is or was designated as a homeless child or youth or an unaccompanied youth at the time of the offense.
C.S.H.B. 3561 repeals Section 263.306(a), Family Code.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3561 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|