BILL ANALYSIS |
H.B. 3663 |
By: Burns |
Agriculture & Livestock |
Committee Report (Unamended) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that a recent change in law relating to agricultural liens has led to unintended consequences and an increase in financing costs for a contract purchaser who purchases an agricultural crop from an agricultural producer under certain marketing contracts. H.B. 3663 seeks to address this issue by providing for a certain exemption relating to marketing contracts and agricultural liens.
|
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
ANALYSIS
H.B. 3663 amends the Property Code to remove the exception for a cotton ginner's lien from the provision granting priority to an agricultural lien over a conflicting security interest in or lien on the agricultural crop or the proceeds from the sale of the crop created by the contract purchaser in favor of a third party. The bill instead specifies that such provision does not affect the validity or priority of a cotton ginner's lien. The bill exempts from such provision a contract purchaser who purchases an agricultural crop from an agricultural producer under certain marketing contracts.
|
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|