BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3664 |
By: King, Tracy O. |
Agriculture & Livestock |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that producers of many agricultural commodities have established assessment programs to assist in marketing, promotion, research and education efforts. C.S.H.B. 3664 seeks to enable the Texas wine and grape growing industry to create a structure to pursue an agricultural commodity assessment program under the direction of the commissioner of agriculture.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3664 amends the Agriculture Code to authorize the Texas Wine Foundation to petition the commissioner of agriculture for the election of a commodity producers board for Texas wine marketing, promotion, research, and education. The bill provides for the composition and terms of the 11-member board. The bill authorizes the board to establish, and authorizes the foundation on the board's behalf to operate, a state wine check off program that is separate from any wine check off program established by federal law. The bill authorizes the foundation to accept gifts, donations, and grants of money, including appropriated funds, from the state government, the federal government, local governments, private corporations, or other persons, to be used for the bill's purposes. The bill designates the foundation as the certified organization to plan, implement, and operate marketing, promotion, research, and education programs under the bill's provisions. The bill requires the foundation to administer a state wine check off program if the board establishes the program.
C.S.H.B. 3664 requires the commissioner, on the recommendation of the foundation, to propose a maximum assessment amount on vineyard growers and wineries in a referendum under the bill's provisions. The bill requires the foundation, if an assessment referendum is approved, to recommend to the commissioner an assessment amount not greater than the maximum amount approved in the referendum. The bill requires the foundation to collect the assessment after the assessment is approved by the commissioner. The bill requires an assessment levied on vineyard growers and wineries to be applied by the foundation to the marketing, promotion, research, and education efforts regarding Texas wine in Texas, the United States, and international markets, including the foundation's administrative costs and the cost of conducting an assessment referendum. The bill establishes that assessments collected by the foundation are not state funds and are not required to be deposited in the state treasury.
C.S.H.B. 3664 requires the commissioner, on the recommendation of the foundation, to conduct a referendum on a proposed maximum assessment amount. The bill provides for voter eligibility, weighting of votes, and voter information confidentiality. The bill requires the foundation to pay all expenses incurred in conducting a referendum with funds collected from the wine industry and authorizes the foundation to recoup those expenses from assessments if the referendum is approved. The bill authorizes a referendum to provide for exemptions from the assessment for a vineyard with less than three acres that produce wine grapes and a winery that processes less than 20,000 pounds of wine grapes grown in Texas. The bill establishes that its provisions prevail to the extent that the provisions conflict with other provisions relating to commodity producers boards.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3664 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|