BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3749 |
By: Phelan |
Land & Resource Management |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that issues with the fleeting or anchoring areas for barges have prompted the need for clarification as to what constitutes an authorized facility or structure on state land. C.S.H.B. 3749 seeks to address this issue by defining "facility or structure" as those terms relate to the prohibition against a person constructing or maintaining a facility or structure on state land or possessing certain state land without the proper authorization and the removal of a facility or structure on state land.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3749 amends the Natural Resources Code to define "facility or structure" for purposes of provisions relating to the prohibition against a person constructing or maintaining a facility or structure on state land or possessing state land on or across which a facility or structure is located without the proper authorization and provisions relating to the removal of a facility or structure on state land by the commissioner of the General Land Office as any structure, work, fixture, or improvement constructed on, affixed to, or worked on land owned by the state, including coastal public land.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3749 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|