BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3769 |
By: King, Ken |
Public Education |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note reports indicating an increase in the number of educators investigated for having an inappropriate relationship with a student. The parties express concern regarding the extent of disciplinary actions taken by some school districts against such educators. C.S.H.B. 3769 seeks to address these issues by providing penalties for misconduct and revising procedures applicable to educators who have inappropriate relationships with students.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill expressly does one or more of the following: creates a criminal offense, increases the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or changes the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3769 amends the Penal Code to remove the condition that a public or private primary or secondary school employee who engages in certain sexual conduct with a student who is not enrolled in the school at which the employee works hold a certificate or permit issued by the State Board for Educator Certification (SBEC) or be required for school district employment to be licensed by a state agency in order to commit the offense of improper relationship between educator and student. The bill instead makes it an offense for such an employee to engage in that conduct with such a student if the employee holds any position that requires certification for school district employment by the SBEC or applicable state agency, regardless of whether the employee holds the appropriate certificate, permit, license, or credential for the position. The bill expands the types of students against whom such an employee commits the offense by engaging in that conduct with the student to include a student the employee knows is enrolled in a public or private primary or secondary school other than a student enrolled in a school at which the employee works. The bill removes from the conduct constituting that offense for such an employee who engages in the conduct with a person the employee knows is a student participant in a certain district-sponsored or school-sponsored educational activity the condition that the employee provides education services to the activity participants.
C.S.H.B. 3769 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to change the types of offenders to whom the requirement that the applicable court clerk notify the SBEC regarding an offense committed by an offender who is certified by the SBEC applies from an offender who commits an offense against a victim who is under 18 years of age and who is convicted or granted deferred adjudication on the basis of an offense against the person or an offense on conviction of which the offender is required to register as a sex offender to an offender who is convicted or granted deferred adjudication community supervision on the basis of an offense for which a conviction or grant of deferred adjudication community supervision requires the defendant to register as a sex offender or who is convicted of an offense against the person involving a victim who was under 18 years of age at the time of the offense.
C.S.H.B. 3769 amends the Education Code to include the superintendent of a school district of innovation among the administrators required to notify the SBEC of certain instances of educator misconduct. The bill changes a condition that, among other conditions, triggers the requirement that an administrator notify the SBEC regarding the misconduct of an educator whose employment at the applicable school district, school, regional education service center, or shared services arrangement was terminated from a condition under which the termination was based on evidence that the educator engaged in certain prohibited or illegal conduct to a condition under which the educator is terminated and there is evidence that the educator engaged in such conduct. The bill extends to the superintendent of a district of innovation and director of a regional education service center or shared services arrangement the duty to complete an investigation of an educator that involves evidence that the educator may have abused or otherwise committed an unlawful act with a student or minor or may have been involved in a romantic relationship with or solicited or engaged in sexual contact with a student or minor. The bill requires the principal of a school district, district of innovation, or open-enrollment charter school campus to notify the superintendent or director of the district or school not later than the seventh business day after the date of an educator's termination of employment or resignation following an alleged incident of certain misconduct or the date the principal knew about an educator's criminal record. The bill changes the deadline for a superintendent or director to file a report with the SBEC regarding an educator's criminal record or a termination of employment or resignation following an alleged incident of misconduct from the seventh day after the date the superintendent or director knew about the educator's criminal record, termination, or resignation to the seventh business day after the date the superintendent or director receives such notification from a principal or otherwise learns about the educator's criminal record, termination, or resignation.
C.S.H.B. 3769 extends the immunity from civil or criminal liability of a superintendent or director who in good faith and while acting in an official capacity files such a report with the SBEC to a principal of a school district, district of innovation, open-enrollment charter school, regional education service center, or shared services arrangement and includes as a good faith action for which the person is immune communicating with another superintendent, director, or principal concerning an educator's criminal record or alleged incident of misconduct. The bill requires the SBEC to determine whether to impose sanctions against a principal who fails to provide the required notification to a superintendent or director. The bill authorizes the SBEC to impose on an educator an administrative penalty of not less than $500 and not more than $10,000 if the educator serves as a superintendent or director who is required to file a report with the SBEC and fails to file the report by the required date or if the educator serves as a principal who is required to notify a superintendent or director about an educator's criminal record or alleged incident of misconduct and fails to provide the notice by the required date. The bill prohibits the SBEC from renewing the certification of an educator against whom such an administrative penalty is imposed until the penalty is paid.
C.S.H.B. 3769 creates a state jail felony offense for a superintendent or director required to file a report with the SBEC or a principal required to notify a superintendent or director to fail to file the report or provide the notice, as applicable, by the required date with intent to conceal an educator's criminal record or alleged incident of misconduct.
C.S.H.B. 3769 includes among the information each educator preparation program is required to provide information regarding appropriate relationships, boundaries, and communications between educators and students. The bill includes among the continuing education requirements for a classroom teacher instruction regarding understanding appropriate relationships, boundaries, and communications between educators and students and includes among the continuing education requirements for a principal instruction regarding preventing, recognizing, and reporting any sexual conduct between an educator and student that constitutes the offense of improper relationship between an educator and student or for which reporting is required under statutory provisions relating to the misconduct of educators.
C.S.H.B. 3769 changes the persons to whom requirements relating to the revocation of the educator certificate of a person who committed an offense and the termination of the person's employment apply from a person who commits an offense against a victim who is under 18 years of age and who is convicted of a felony offense against the person or an offense on conviction of which a defendant is required to register as a sex offender to a person who is convicted of or placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for an offense for which a defendant is required to register as a sex offender or who is convicted of a felony offense against the person involving a victim who was under 18 years of age at the time of the offense. The bill includes the Texas Education Agency (TEA) among the required recipients of the SBEC notice of the revocation of such a person's certificate and the basis for the revocation. The bill conditions the authority of a school district or charter school that receives such notice, or becomes aware of a conviction or deferred adjudication, regarding a person who is employed under a probationary, continuing, or term contract to take certain action against the person on the action being approved by the board of trustees or governing body of the district or school or a designee of the board or governing body.
C.S.H.B. 3769 authorizes the SBEC to suspend or revoke a certificate held by an educator, impose other sanctions against the person, or refuse to issue an educator certificate to the person if the person assists another person in obtaining employment at a public school district or charter school, other than by the routine transmission of administrative and personnel files, and the educator knew that the other person has previously engaged in sexual misconduct with a minor or student in violation of the law. The bill authorizes the commissioner of education to require a school district to revoke or decline to issue a school district teaching permit issued to or requested by a person subject to such SBEC action.
C.S.H.B. 3769 authorizes the commissioner, during an investigation by the commissioner for an alleged incident of misconduct, to issue a subpoena to compel the attendance of a relevant witness. The bill exempts a document evaluating the performance of a teacher or administrator from disclosure under state public information law. The bill authorizes a school district or charter school to give TEA a document evaluating the performance of a teacher or administrator employed by the district or school for purposes of an investigation conducted by TEA. The bill authorizes the use of such a document in a disciplinary proceeding against a teacher or administrator based on a submitted report concerning an alleged incident of misconduct, except as otherwise provided by a court order prohibiting disclosure, if permissible under rules of evidence applicable to a contested case under the Administrative Procedure Act. The bill establishes that a document so provided to TEA remains confidential unless the document becomes part of the record in a contested case.
C.S.H.B. 3769 requires a school district to adopt a written policy concerning electronic communications between a school employee and a student enrolled in the district and sets out the required contents of such a policy. The bill includes among the authorized grounds on which the commissioner may authorize special accreditation investigations the failure of a school district for any reason to produce, at TEA request, evidence or an investigation report relating to an educator who is under investigation by the SBEC.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3769 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|