BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3829 |
By: Schaefer |
Corrections |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties have called for further clarity in defining what constitutes an administrative violation for purposes of parole and mandatory supervision. C.S.H.B. 3829 seeks to provide this clarity by defining "administrative violation" for those purposes.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3829 amends the Government Code to define "administrative violation," for purposes of statutory provisions governing parole and mandatory supervision, as a technical violation of a condition of release on parole or to mandatory supervision that does not involve alleged criminal conduct.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3829 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|