BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3971 |
By: Schofield |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that judicial salaries in Texas are adjusted too infrequently, leaving many judges inadequately compensated. C.S.H.B. 3971 seeks to ensure a competent judiciary in Texas by establishing a consistent formula for determining state judicial salaries.
|
||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3971 amends the Government Code to change the annual salary from the state to which a judge of a district court is entitled from a salary of at least $125,000 to a salary that is equal to 82.5 percent of the salary of a justice of the Supreme Court of Texas other than the chief justice. The bill changes the annual salary from the state to which a justice of a court of appeals other than the chief justice is entitled from a salary equal to 110 percent of the salary of a district judge to a salary equal to 91 percent of the salary of a justice of the supreme court other than the chief justice. The bill clarifies that the supreme court justice salary that provides the basis for calculating the cap on the combined salary of a justice of a court of appeals other than the chief justice from all state and county sources and the cap on the combined salary of the chief justice of such a court is the salary provided for a justice of the supreme court other than the chief justice.
C.S.H.B. 3971 changes the annual salary from the state to which a justice of the supreme court other than the chief justice and a judge of the court of criminal appeals other than the presiding judge are entitled from a salary equal to 120 percent of the salary of a district judge to a salary calculated by a formula specified by the bill based on the salaries of certain other justices in certain populous states, judges of a United States Court of Appeals, and first-year associate attorneys employed in Texas by certain private law firms. The bill requires the Office of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System and the State Bar of Texas, as applicable, to collect and provide to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB) the salary information required for such calculation not later than February 1 of each year. The bill requires the LBB to calculate such annual salary based on certain information collected and provided to the LBB under the bill and to provide the amount to the comptroller of public accounts not later than March 1 of each year. The bill requires the comptroller, on October 1 of each year, to adjust all judicial salaries for state judges paid by the state based on the amount provided by the LBB but prohibits the adjusted salary from increasing by more than four percent per year or by the inflation rate during the previous calendar year, as determined by the comptroller on the basis of changes in the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, whichever is higher. The bill requires the comptroller to publish in the Texas Register, not later than May 1 of each year, a list of all such judicial salaries to be paid beginning on the following October 1.
C.S.H.B. 3971 repeals Chapter 35, Government Code, which governs the Judicial Compensation Commission, effective August 31, 2021.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
Except as otherwise provided, September 1, 2019.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3971 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|