BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.S.B. 4 |
By: Perry |
State Affairs |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Concerns have been raised about the extent to which certain entities are cooperating with the federal government in the enforcement of immigration laws. C.S.S.B. 4 seeks to address these concerns and increase cooperation by, among other things, prohibiting the applicable entities from adopting or enforcing a measure under which those entities prohibit the enforcement of state or federal immigration laws or, as demonstrated by pattern or practice, the enforcement of those immigration laws.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill expressly does one or more of the following: creates a criminal offense, increases the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or changes the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.S.B. 4 amends the Government Code to prohibit a campus police department of a public, private, or independent institution of higher education or a local entity, defined by the bill, among other terms, as the governing body of or any other body that is part of a municipality, county, or special district or authority or an officer or employee of such a body whose primary duties involve the oversight or management of, or controlling the direction of, other officers or employees of the body from adopting or enforcing a measure under which such a department or local entity prohibits the enforcement of state or federal immigration laws or from prohibiting, as demonstrated by pattern or practice, the enforcement of those immigration laws. The bill's provisions relating to such enforcement by applicable local entities and campus police departments expressly do not apply to a school district or open-enrollment charter school; to the release of information contained in educational records of an educational agency or institution, except in conformity with the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974; to a hospital or hospital district created under Health and Safety Code provisions relating to local hospitals or hospital districts, a hospital owned or operated by such an institution of higher education, or a hospital district created under general or special law authorized by the Texas Constitution, to the extent that the hospital or hospital district is providing access to or delivering medical or health care services as required under specified applicable federal or state laws; to the public health department of such a local entity; or to a commissioned peace officer employed or contracted by a religious organization during the officer's employment with the organization or while the officer is performing the contract. The bill specifies that such inapplicability to the described hospitals and hospital districts excludes the application of the bill's provisions regarding the enforcement of state and federal immigration laws by such local entities and campus police departments to a commissioned peace officer employed by such a hospital or hospital district during the officer's employment or commissioned by the hospital or hospital district.
C.S.S.B. 4 prohibits such a local entity or campus police department from having a pattern or practice of prohibiting persons who are employed by or otherwise under the direction or control of the entity or department from doing any of the following: inquiring into the immigration status of an arrested person; with respect to information relating to the immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any arrested person, including information regarding a person's place of birth, sending the information to or requesting or receiving the information from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services or U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), maintaining the information, or exchanging the information with another local entity or campus police department or a federal or state governmental entity; if requested by a federal immigration officer, assisting or cooperating with a federal immigration officer as reasonable and necessary, including providing enforcement assistance; or permitting a federal immigration officer to enter and conduct enforcement activities at a jail to enforce federal immigration laws. The bill prohibits a local entity, campus police department, or person employed by or otherwise under the direction or control of such an entity or department from considering race, color, religion, language, or national origin while enforcing state or federal immigration laws except to the extent permitted by the United States Constitution or the Texas Constitution.
C.S.S.B. 4 establishes a complaint process by which any citizen residing in the jurisdiction of such a local entity or any citizen enrolled at or employed by such an institution of higher education may file a complaint with the attorney general, contingent on the person asserting facts supporting an allegation that the entity or the institution's campus police department has violated the bill's provisions relating to policies regarding immigration enforcement. The bill authorizes the attorney general to file a petition for a writ of mandamus or apply for other appropriate equitable relief to compel compliance with those bill provisions if the attorney general determines that such a complaint is valid and sets out provisions relating to such a filing or application. The bill authorizes the attorney general to recover reasonable expenses incurred in obtaining such relief and provides for an appeal of a suit brought for relief. The bill subjects a local entity or campus police department that intentionally violates the bill's provisions relating to policies regarding immigration enforcement to a civil penalty, sets out provisions related to such a penalty, the amount of such a penalty, and the deposit of such a penalty to the compensation to victims of crime fund, and waives and abolishes sovereign immunity of the state and governmental immunity of a county and municipality to suit to the extent of liability created by these bill provisions regarding the civil penalty.
C.S.S.B. 4 provides for the adoption of a written policy regarding community outreach activities by an applicable law enforcement agency to educate the public that a peace officer may not inquire into the immigration status of a victim of or witness to an alleged criminal offense except under certain circumstances and requires such a policy to include outreach to victims of family violence and sexual assault. The bill requires the criminal justice division in the governor's office to establish and administer a competitive grant program to provide financial assistance to counties and municipalities to offset costs related to enforcing state and federal immigration laws or complying with, honoring, or fulfilling immigration detainer requests. The bill requires the division to establish eligibility criteria for grant applicants, grant application procedures, criteria for evaluating grant applications and awarding grants, guidelines related to grant amounts, and procedures for monitoring the use of a grant awarded under the grant program and ensuring compliance with any conditions of the grant. The bill authorizes the division to use any revenue available for the grant program.
C.S.S.B. 4 requires the attorney general to defend a local entity, as defined by the bill, in any action in any court if the entity's executive head or governing body, as applicable, requests the attorney general's assistance in the defense and the attorney general determines that the cause of action arises out of a claim involving the local entity's good-faith compliance with an immigration detainer request as required by the bill's Code of Criminal Procedure provisions regarding an applicable law enforcement agency's duties related to immigration detainer requests. The bill authorizes the attorney general to settle or compromise any and all such claims. The bill makes the state liable for the expenses, costs, judgment, or settlement of the claims arising out of the representation but establishes that the state may not be liable for any expenses, costs, judgments, or settlements of any claims against a local entity not being represented by the attorney general under these provisions.
C.S.S.B. 4 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to require a law enforcement agency that has custody of a person subject to an immigration detainer request issued by ICE to comply with, honor, and fulfill any request made in the detainer request provided by the federal government and inform the person that the person is being held pursuant to an immigration detainer request issued by ICE. A law enforcement agency is not required to perform such an imposed duty with respect to a person who has provided proof that the person is a United States citizen.
C.S.S.B. 4 requires the judge in a criminal case in which the judgment requires the defendant to be confined in a secure correctional facility and in which the defendant is subject to an immigration detainer request to issue an order at the time of pronouncement of a sentence of confinement requiring the secure correctional facility in which the defendant is to be confined and all appropriate government officers, including a sheriff, a warden, or members of the Board of Pardons and Paroles, as appropriate, to require the defendant to serve in federal custody the final portion of the defendant's sentence, not to exceed a period of seven days, following the facility's or officer's determination that the change in the place of confinement will facilitate the seamless transfer of the defendant into federal custody. The bill authorizes a facility or officer acting under exigent circumstances to perform the transfer in the absence of such an order after making the requisite determination. The bill specifies that these provisions apply only if appropriate officers of the federal government consent to the transfer of the defendant into federal custody under such described circumstances. The bill requires the judge, if the applicable information described by the bill regarding a defendant subject to an immigration detainer request is not available at the time sentence is pronounced in the case, to issue the order as soon as the information becomes available and the bill establishes that the judge retains jurisdiction for the purpose of issuing such an order.
C.S.S.B. 4 establishes that a surety may not be relieved of the surety's undertaking before forfeiture on account of delivering to the sheriff of the county in which the prosecution is pending and to the office of the prosecuting attorney an affidavit stating that the accused is incarcerated in federal custody if the accused is in federal custody to determine whether the accused is lawfully present in the United States. The bill limits the authority of a peace officer to inquire as to the nationality or immigration status of a victim of or witness to an alleged criminal offense the officer is in the course of investigating to instances in which the officer determines that the inquiry is necessary to investigate the offense or provide the victim or witness with information about federal visas designed to protect individuals providing assistance to law enforcement. That limitation expressly does not prevent a peace officer from conducting a separate investigation of any other alleged criminal offense or from inquiring as to the nationality or immigration status of a victim of or witness to a criminal offense if the officer has probable cause to believe that the victim or witness has engaged in specific conduct constituting a separate criminal offense.
C.S.S.B. 4 amends the Penal Code to create the Class A misdemeanor offense of failure to comply with an immigration detainer request for a person who is a sheriff, chief of police, or constable, or a person who otherwise has primary authority for administering a jail, who has custody of a person subject to an immigration detainer request issued by ICE and who knowingly fails to comply with the detainer request. It is an express exception to the application of such an offense that the person who was subject to the detainer request had previously provided proof that the person was a United States citizen.
C.S.S.B. 4 amends the Local Government Code to specify that, for purposes of the provision establishing that the conviction of a county officer by a petit jury for any felony or for a misdemeanor involving official misconduct operates as an immediate removal of that officer from office, the term "a misdemeanor involving official misconduct" includes the misdemeanor Penal Code offense of failure to comply with an immigration detainer request, as created by the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF SENATE ENGROSSED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.S.B. 4 may differ from the engrossed in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the engrossed and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|