BILL ANALYSIS |
|
S.B. 467 |
|
By: Lucio |
|
Elections |
|
Committee Report (Unamended) |
|
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that ballot propositions should be worded in a way that minimizes confusion among voters. S.B. 467 seeks to require a ballot proposition to substantially submit the question with such definiteness and certainty in identifying the proposition's chief features that the voters are not misled.
|
|
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
|
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
|
ANALYSIS
S.B. 467 amends the Election Code to require a ballot proposition to substantially submit the question with such definiteness and certainty in identifying the proposition's chief features that the voters are not misled.
|
|
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|