BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.S.B. 803 |
By: Seliger |
Higher Education |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties call for a study on the feasibility of requiring certain researchers to make research papers available to the public. C.S.S.B. 803 seeks to address this issue by requiring the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to work with public institutions of higher education and other appropriate interested persons to conduct such a study.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.S.B. 803 amends the Education Code to require the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, in consultation with institutions of higher education, publishing companies, and any other interested persons the coordinating board considers appropriate, to study the feasibility of requiring each researcher whose research is funded wholly or partly with state money or with federal money, if the research is conducted in Texas or by an institution of higher education, to submit to a state agency an electronic copy of each original research paper by the researcher that is accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The bill sets out items the study must examine and requires the coordinating board, not later than December 1, 2018, to report the results of the study, its findings, and any recommendations to the legislature. The bill expires September 1, 2019.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2017.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF SENATE ENGROSSED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.S.B. 803 may differ from the engrossed in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the engrossed and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|