BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.S.B. 924 |
By: Perry |
Human Services |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that the consolidation of the Department of Aging and Disability Services into the Health and Human Services Commission has resulted in a need to update and revise the law concerning the informal dispute resolution process for certain disputes involving an assisted living facility. C.S.S.B. 924 seeks to provide those updates and revisions and to ensure that an appropriate disinterested person adjudicates such disputes.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.S.B. 924 amends the Health and Safety Code to specify that the disputes to which statutory provisions apply relating to the informal dispute resolution process concerning a statement of violations under the Assisted Living Facility Licensing Act formerly applicable to a dispute between an assisted living facility and the Department of Aging and Disability Services are disputes between an assisted living facility and the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC). The bill changes the deadline by which HHSC must forward to an assisted living facility subject to such a dispute a copy of all information referenced in the disputed statement of violations or on which a citation is based in connection with the survey, inspection, investigation, or other visit from the 10th business day after the date the assisted living facility requests an informal dispute resolution to the 20th business day after that date. The bill requires the name of or any information that would reasonably lead to the identification of any complainant, witness, or informant to be redacted from information provided to an assisted living facility during the informal dispute resolution process. The bill authorizes HHSC to charge and requires the assisted living facility to pay the reasonable costs associated with making such required redactions. The bill removes provisions conditioning the factual arguments raised in the informal dispute resolution process as the basis on which HHSC must give consideration. The bill conditions the requirement that the informal dispute resolution process require that the assisted living facility and HHSC be given a reasonable opportunity to submit arguments and information supporting the position of the assisted living facility or HHSC and to respond to arguments and information presented against the entities on the assisted living facility submitting its arguments and supporting information not later than the 10th business day after the date of receipt of certain materials provided by HHSC during the informal dispute resolution process. The bill requires the informal dispute resolution process to require that HHSC bear the burden of proving the violation of a standard or standards.
C.S.S.B. 924 amends the Government Code to remove the condition that an appropriate disinterested person with whom HHSC is required to contract as part of an informal dispute resolution process for certain long-term care facilities be a nonprofit organization and to specify that the requirement for HHSC to contract with an appropriate disinterested person as part of such a process to adjudicate disputes between a facility and HHSC concerning a statement of violations includes a facility licensed under the Assisted Living Facility Licensing Act. The bill requires the rules adopted by the executive commissioner of HHSC that relate to such a dispute to incorporate the requirements prescribed under the Health and Safety Code applicable to those disputes. |
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF SENATE ENGROSSED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.S.B. 924 may differ from the engrossed in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the engrossed and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|