BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.S.B. 957 |
By: Campbell |
Elections |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
According to interested parties, a ballot on which propositions with like names or numbers appear may cause voter confusion. C.S.S.B. 957 seeks to minimize that confusion by requiring each political subdivision's ballot proposition to be assigned a unique number or letter on the ballot.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.S.B. 957 amends the Election Code to require that each political subdivision's proposition on a ballot on which more than one measure is to be voted on be assigned a unique number or letter on the ballot. The bill requires the authority ordering the election to assign a letter of the alphabet to each proposition on the ballot that corresponds to its order on the ballot, unless the proposition is to be voted on statewide, in which case the bill requires the authority to assign a number to the measure that corresponds to its order on the ballot. The bill requires the secretary of state to prescribe procedures to implement provisions governing the ordering of and assignment of a unique number or letter, as applicable, to propositions in such an election in which such a ballot would appear. The bill requires a proposed constitutional amendment to be placed on the ballot before all other propositions.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2017.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF SENATE ENGROSSED AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.S.B. 957 may differ from the engrossed in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the engrossed and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|